<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to BarCamp Like an Old Pro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro</link>
	<description>Commentary about high tech happenings in hogtown</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Tanglao</title>
		<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/comment-page-1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Tanglao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 17:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidcrow.ca/?p=614#comment-407</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;+1 to deb&#039;s comments and +1 to david&#039;s post at:&lt;br /&gt;http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;bottom line: less noise and a bit more &#039;structuring the unstructured&#039; and BarCamp Tdot aka Torcamp2 would have been even better&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 to deb&#39;s comments and +1 to david&#39;s post at:<br /><a href="http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing" rel="nofollow">http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing</a></p>
<p>bottom line: less noise and a bit more &#39;structuring the unstructured&#39; and BarCamp Tdot aka Torcamp2 would have been even better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb Hartmann</title>
		<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/comment-page-1#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb Hartmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidcrow.ca/?p=614#comment-405</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too am concerned that people feel free to (responsible to)
participate. So, I&#039;ll say it one more time: the simple practices of
OpenSpace may seem silly to some, but they provide a little bit of
ceremony to level the playing field and remind everyone that they are
participants, not observers. That they are making the event, and if they
didn&#039;t like it, they should look to themselves. OpenSpace uses
psychology to disarm preconceptions, power games, cliques. I felt there
was too much *perceived* &quot;power&quot; among the organizers. We didn&#039;t hold on to it, explicitly, I don&#039;t think. But silence is a powerful power tool.
And because there was no opportunity made to explicitly debunk the myth of leadership, people assumed it was there and acted accordingly.
Silence worked against us &amp; we were not explicit about how things
worked, so people assumed it worked the way they are used to (i.e. not
like a BarCamp)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I heard people say the following (no, really): &quot;what the heck does
&#039;wildcard and beer&#039; mean?&quot; (on the schedule); &quot;I wish I&#039;d understood how
it worked, it took me hours to figure it out&quot;; &quot;I wish people would have
had more time to prepare, so they would have had better slides&quot;; &quot;blah,
blah, blah for 30 minutes. so that&#039;s it!&quot; (huh?); and &quot;somebody moved my talk. no, *I&#039;m* the convenor!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I offered a couple of the organizers my services as facilitator,
explained carefully the pattern I used (which is really quite close to
what we did, except for expectation setting and sharing results). They
didn&#039;t answer my email. I asked for feedback. They didn&#039;t answer. Nice.
So I sent a note saying &quot;I assume the answer is no, so I&#039;ll put my
energy elsewhere&quot;. Oh well, I tell myself they&#039;re young and brash. the
down side of being young and iconoclastic :-) I could have my offer to a
largeer number of people, but this event definitely, by the very way it
was created, had a perceived power structure, even to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Information lowers the intimidation barrier and levels the playing field &amp; we all know the rules, we all are tasked with the same mission: make this event for yourself. We all are given the tools to do so &amp; a
scheduling system that is not cryptic, an understanding of what responsibilities (and privileges, like changing the time or location) of
the convenor, that it&#039;s ok (necessary) to self-organize. The avantgarde
don&#039;t need this prompting &amp; that&#039;s you and me. But the &quot;early majority&quot;
do, and I think that&#039;s who came out this time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I must admit, although TorCamp2 was ok, I was disappointed. It lacked passion. And it was uncommunicative &amp; I couldn&#039;t tell what half the
schedule items were. In Open Space everyone gets to stand up and state
what their topic is in a whole sentence, and people get to see their
face. Also, if there end up being 5 topics in one slot, it&#039;s ok, it is
encouraged, and it will self-organize to a hallway or courtyard or
whatever. Because this wasn&#039;t discussed, only 4 items appeared in each
of four apparently limited spots. As I teach my Agile teams - Perception
is Reality - it doesn&#039;t matter what we meant or wanted - what eventually
happens is going to be informed by *people&#039;s perceptions*, and if we
don&#039;t communicate well, these perceptions will have to rely on
preconceptions.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want to know how I run a classic OpenSpace, you can read it here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html&quot;&gt;http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html&lt;/a&gt;.
Perhaps we&#039;ll have an opportunity to try it some time. Whatever. If
TorCamp dies, as someone noted, something else will spring up. But I&#039;d
be happy to help people experience the incredible empowerment and
synergy of a huge collaborative party :-) Why? Just because I&#039;m an
inveterate collaboration-evangelist :-) and can&#039;t help myself :-))&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am concerned that people feel free to (responsible to)<br />
participate. So, I&#39;ll say it one more time: the simple practices of<br />
OpenSpace may seem silly to some, but they provide a little bit of<br />
ceremony to level the playing field and remind everyone that they are<br />
participants, not observers. That they are making the event, and if they<br />
didn&#39;t like it, they should look to themselves. OpenSpace uses<br />
psychology to disarm preconceptions, power games, cliques. I felt there<br />
was too much *perceived* &#8220;power&#8221; among the organizers. We didn&#39;t hold on to it, explicitly, I don&#8217;t think. But silence is a powerful power tool.<br />
And because there was no opportunity made to explicitly debunk the myth of leadership, people assumed it was there and acted accordingly.<br />
Silence worked against us &#38; we were not explicit about how things<br />
worked, so people assumed it worked the way they are used to (i.e. not<br />
like a BarCamp)</p>
<p>I heard people say the following (no, really): &#8220;what the heck does<br />
&#39;wildcard and beer&#39; mean?&#8221; (on the schedule); &#8220;I wish I&#39;d understood how<br />
it worked, it took me hours to figure it out&#8221;; &#8220;I wish people would have<br />
had more time to prepare, so they would have had better slides&#8221;; &#8220;blah,<br />
blah, blah for 30 minutes. so that&#39;s it!&#8221; (huh?); and &#8220;somebody moved my talk. no, *I&#39;m* the convenor!&#8221;</p>
<p>I offered a couple of the organizers my services as facilitator,<br />
explained carefully the pattern I used (which is really quite close to<br />
what we did, except for expectation setting and sharing results). They<br />
didn&#39;t answer my email. I asked for feedback. They didn&#39;t answer. Nice.<br />
So I sent a note saying &#8220;I assume the answer is no, so I&#39;ll put my<br />
energy elsewhere&#8221;. Oh well, I tell myself they&#39;re young and brash. the<br />
down side of being young and iconoclastic <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I could have my offer to a<br />
largeer number of people, but this event definitely, by the very way it<br />
was created, had a perceived power structure, even to me.</p>
<p>Information lowers the intimidation barrier and levels the playing field &#38; we all know the rules, we all are tasked with the same mission: make this event for yourself. We all are given the tools to do so &#38; a<br />
scheduling system that is not cryptic, an understanding of what responsibilities (and privileges, like changing the time or location) of<br />
the convenor, that it&#39;s ok (necessary) to self-organize. The avantgarde<br />
don&#39;t need this prompting &#38; that&#39;s you and me. But the &#8220;early majority&#8221;<br />
do, and I think that&#39;s who came out this time.</p>
<p>I must admit, although TorCamp2 was ok, I was disappointed. It lacked passion. And it was uncommunicative &#38; I couldn&#39;t tell what half the<br />
schedule items were. In Open Space everyone gets to stand up and state<br />
what their topic is in a whole sentence, and people get to see their<br />
face. Also, if there end up being 5 topics in one slot, it&#39;s ok, it is<br />
encouraged, and it will self-organize to a hallway or courtyard or<br />
whatever. Because this wasn&#8217;t discussed, only 4 items appeared in each<br />
of four apparently limited spots. As I teach my Agile teams &#8211; Perception<br />
is Reality &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t matter what we meant or wanted &#8211; what eventually<br />
happens is going to be informed by *people&#8217;s perceptions*, and if we<br />
don&#8217;t communicate well, these perceptions will have to rely on<br />
preconceptions.</p>
<p>If you want to know how I run a classic OpenSpace, you can read it here:<br />
<a href="http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html">http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html</a>.<br />
Perhaps we&#39;ll have an opportunity to try it some time. Whatever. If<br />
TorCamp dies, as someone noted, something else will spring up. But I&#39;d<br />
be happy to help people experience the incredible empowerment and<br />
synergy of a huge collaborative party <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Why? Just because I&#39;m an<br />
inveterate collaboration-evangelist <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and can&#39;t help myself <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Tanglao</title>
		<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/comment-page-1#comment-10175</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Tanglao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidcrow.ca/?p=614#comment-10175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;+1 to deb&#039;s comments and +1 to david&#039;s post at:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;  	&lt;p&gt;bottom line: less noise and a bit more &#039;structuring the unstructured&#039; and BarCamp Tdot aka Torcamp2 would have been even better&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;p&gt;+1 to deb&#039;s comments and +1 to david&#039;s post at:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br" rel="nofollow">http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br</a> /&gt;<br />
&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&#038;quot</a>; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;<a href="http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&#038;gt" rel="nofollow">http://davidcrow.ca/article/1127/barcamptdot-some-things-need-changing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/a&#038;gt</a>; &lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;<br />
  	&lt;p&gt;bottom line: less noise and a bit more &#039;structuring the unstructured&#039; and BarCamp Tdot aka Torcamp2 would have been even better&lt;/p&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb Hartmann</title>
		<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/comment-page-1#comment-10177</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb Hartmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidcrow.ca/?p=614#comment-10177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I too am concerned that people feel free to (responsible to)&lt;br /&gt;  participate. So, I&#039;ll say it one more time: the simple practices of&lt;br /&gt;  OpenSpace may seem silly to some, but they provide a little bit of&lt;br /&gt;  ceremony to level the playing field and remind everyone that they are&lt;br /&gt;  participants, not observers. That they are making the event, and if they&lt;br /&gt;  didn&#039;t like it, they should look to themselves. OpenSpace uses&lt;br /&gt;  psychology to disarm preconceptions, power games, cliques. I felt there&lt;br /&gt;  was too much *perceived* &quot;power&quot; among the organizers. We didn&#039;t hold on to it, explicitly, I don&#039;t think. But silence is a powerful power tool.&lt;br /&gt;  And because there was no opportunity made to explicitly debunk the myth of leadership, people assumed it was there and acted accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;  Silence worked against us &amp; we were not explicit about how things&lt;br /&gt;  worked, so people assumed it worked the way they are used to (i.e. not&lt;br /&gt;  like a BarCamp)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I heard people say the following (no, really): &quot;what the heck does&lt;br /&gt;  &#039;wildcard and beer&#039; mean?&quot; (on the schedule); &quot;I wish I&#039;d understood how&lt;br /&gt;  it worked, it took me hours to figure it out&quot;; &quot;I wish people would have&lt;br /&gt;  had more time to prepare, so they would have had better slides&quot;; &quot;blah,&lt;br /&gt;  blah, blah for 30 minutes. so that&#039;s it!&quot; (huh?); and &quot;somebody moved my talk. no, *I&#039;m* the convenor!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I offered a couple of the organizers my services as facilitator,&lt;br /&gt;  explained carefully the pattern I used (which is really quite close to&lt;br /&gt;  what we did, except for expectation setting and sharing results). They&lt;br /&gt;  didn&#039;t answer my email. I asked for feedback. They didn&#039;t answer. Nice.&lt;br /&gt;  So I sent a note saying &quot;I assume the answer is no, so I&#039;ll put my&lt;br /&gt;  energy elsewhere&quot;. Oh well, I tell myself they&#039;re young and brash. the&lt;br /&gt;  down side of being young and iconoclastic :-) I could have my offer to a&lt;br /&gt;  largeer number of people, but this event definitely, by the very way it&lt;br /&gt;  was created, had a perceived power structure, even to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;p&gt;Information lowers the intimidation barrier and levels the playing field &amp; we all know the rules, we all are tasked with the same mission: make this event for yourself. We all are given the tools to do so &amp; a&lt;br /&gt;  scheduling system that is not cryptic, an understanding of what responsibilities (and privileges, like changing the time or location) of&lt;br /&gt;  the convenor, that it&#039;s ok (necessary) to self-organize. The avantgarde&lt;br /&gt;  don&#039;t need this prompting &amp; that&#039;s you and me. But the &quot;early majority&quot;&lt;br /&gt;  do, and I think that&#039;s who came out this time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;p&gt;I must admit, although TorCamp2 was ok, I was disappointed. It lacked passion. And it was uncommunicative &amp; I couldn&#039;t tell what half the&lt;br /&gt;  schedule items were. In Open Space everyone gets to stand up and state&lt;br /&gt;  what their topic is in a whole sentence, and people get to see their&lt;br /&gt;  face. Also, if there end up being 5 topics in one slot, it&#039;s ok, it is&lt;br /&gt;  encouraged, and it will self-organize to a hallway or courtyard or&lt;br /&gt;  whatever. Because this wasn&#039;t discussed, only 4 items appeared in each&lt;br /&gt;  of four apparently limited spots. As I teach my Agile teams - Perception&lt;br /&gt;  is Reality - it doesn&#039;t matter what we meant or wanted - what eventually&lt;br /&gt;  happens is going to be informed by *people&#039;s perceptions*, and if we&lt;br /&gt;  don&#039;t communicate well, these perceptions will have to rely on&lt;br /&gt;  preconceptions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;  &lt;p&gt;If you want to know how I run a classic OpenSpace, you can read it here:&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/op...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-f...&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-f...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/a&gt;  Perhaps we&#039;ll have an opportunity to try it some time. Whatever. If&lt;br /&gt;  TorCamp dies, as someone noted, something else will spring up. But I&#039;d&lt;br /&gt;  be happy to help people experience the incredible empowerment and&lt;br /&gt;  synergy of a huge collaborative party :-) Why? Just because I&#039;m an&lt;br /&gt;  inveterate collaboration-evangelist :-) and can&#039;t help myself :-))&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;p&gt;I too am concerned that people feel free to (responsible to)&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  participate. So, I&#039;ll say it one more time: the simple practices of&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  OpenSpace may seem silly to some, but they provide a little bit of&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  ceremony to level the playing field and remind everyone that they are&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  participants, not observers. That they are making the event, and if they&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  didn&#039;t like it, they should look to themselves. OpenSpace uses&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  psychology to disarm preconceptions, power games, cliques. I felt there&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  was too much *perceived* &amp;quot;power&amp;quot; among the organizers. We didn&#039;t hold on to it, explicitly, I don&#039;t think. But silence is a powerful power tool.&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  And because there was no opportunity made to explicitly debunk the myth of leadership, people assumed it was there and acted accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  Silence worked against us &#038; we were not explicit about how things&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  worked, so people assumed it worked the way they are used to (i.e. not&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  like a BarCamp)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;p&gt;I heard people say the following (no, really): &amp;quot;what the heck does&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &#039;wildcard and beer&#039; mean?&amp;quot; (on the schedule); &amp;quot;I wish I&#039;d understood how&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  it worked, it took me hours to figure it out&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;I wish people would have&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  had more time to prepare, so they would have had better slides&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;blah,&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  blah, blah for 30 minutes. so that&#039;s it!&amp;quot; (huh?); and &amp;quot;somebody moved my talk. no, *I&#039;m* the convenor!&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;p&gt;I offered a couple of the organizers my services as facilitator,&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  explained carefully the pattern I used (which is really quite close to&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  what we did, except for expectation setting and sharing results). They&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  didn&#039;t answer my email. I asked for feedback. They didn&#039;t answer. Nice.&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  So I sent a note saying &amp;quot;I assume the answer is no, so I&#039;ll put my&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  energy elsewhere&amp;quot;. Oh well, I tell myself they&#039;re young and brash. the&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  down side of being young and iconoclastic <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I could have my offer to a&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  largeer number of people, but this event definitely, by the very way it&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  was created, had a perceived power structure, even to me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;p&gt;Information lowers the intimidation barrier and levels the playing field &#038; we all know the rules, we all are tasked with the same mission: make this event for yourself. We all are given the tools to do so &#038; a&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  scheduling system that is not cryptic, an understanding of what responsibilities (and privileges, like changing the time or location) of&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  the convenor, that it&#039;s ok (necessary) to self-organize. The avantgarde&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  don&#039;t need this prompting &#038; that&#039;s you and me. But the &amp;quot;early majority&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  do, and I think that&#039;s who came out this time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;p&gt;I must admit, although TorCamp2 was ok, I was disappointed. It lacked passion. And it was uncommunicative &#038; I couldn&#039;t tell what half the&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  schedule items were. In Open Space everyone gets to stand up and state&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  what their topic is in a whole sentence, and people get to see their&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  face. Also, if there end up being 5 topics in one slot, it&#039;s ok, it is&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  encouraged, and it will self-organize to a hallway or courtyard or&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  whatever. Because this wasn&#039;t discussed, only 4 items appeared in each&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  of four apparently limited spots. As I teach my Agile teams &#8211; Perception&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  is Reality &#8211; it doesn&#039;t matter what we meant or wanted &#8211; what eventually&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  happens is going to be informed by *people&#039;s perceptions*, and if we&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  don&#039;t communicate well, these perceptions will have to rely on&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  preconceptions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;p&gt;If you want to know how I run a classic OpenSpace, you can read it here:&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-for-collaborative.html&#038;quot</a>; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/op" rel="nofollow">http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/op</a>&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;<br />
&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-f" rel="nofollow">http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-f</a>&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;.&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;<a href="http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-f" rel="nofollow">http://vitalbrew.blogspot.com/2006/04/openspace-f</a>&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/a&gt;  Perhaps we&#039;ll have an opportunity to try it some time. Whatever. If&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  TorCamp dies, as someone noted, something else will spring up. But I&#039;d&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  be happy to help people experience the incredible empowerment and&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  synergy of a huge collaborative party <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Why? Just because I&#039;m an&lt;br /&gt;<br />
  inveterate collaboration-evangelist <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  and can&#039;t help myself <img src='http://davidcrow.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )&lt;/p&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip A D Smith</title>
		<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/comment-page-1#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip A D Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 18:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidcrow.ca/?p=614#comment-375</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;David, some of your recent posts sparked me to think about what a movement of unconferences focused on progressive social issues would look like (some ideas are &lt;a href=&quot;http://communitybandwidth.ca/phillipadsmith/progressive-unconferences&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). Would enjoy your thoughts on how it might or might not work outside of our gadget-obsessed technology communities?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, some of your recent posts sparked me to think about what a movement of unconferences focused on progressive social issues would look like (some ideas are <a href="http://communitybandwidth.ca/phillipadsmith/progressive-unconferences">here</a>). Would enjoy your thoughts on how it might or might not work outside of our gadget-obsessed technology communities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip A D Smith</title>
		<link>http://davidcrow.ca/article/1105/how-to-barcamp-like-an-old-pro/comment-page-1#comment-10176</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip A D Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davidcrow.ca/?p=614#comment-10176</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;David, some of your recent posts sparked me to think about what a movement of unconferences focused on progressive social issues would look like (some ideas are &lt;a href=&quot;http://communitybandwidth.ca/phillipadsmith/progressive-unconferences&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). Would enjoy your thoughts on how it might or might not work outside of our gadget-obsessed technology communities?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;p&gt;David, some of your recent posts sparked me to think about what a movement of unconferences focused on progressive social issues would look like (some ideas are &lt;a href=&quot;<a href="http://communitybandwidth.ca/phillipadsmith/progressive-unconferences&#038;quot" rel="nofollow">http://communitybandwidth.ca/phillipadsmith/progressive-unconferences&#038;quot</a>; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;). Would enjoy your thoughts on how it might or might not work outside of our gadget-obsessed technology communities?&lt;/p&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

